Example Weightings:

		Full-time	Adjunct
Teaching and Student Learning:
	Instructional Performance (Required: At least 40%)	50%	50%
	Student Feedback and Faculty Reflection (Required: Between 20% and 30%)	25%	25%
Professional Responsibilities:
	Administrative Performance (Required: At least 5%)	5%	15%
	Professional Development and Growth (Required: At least 5%)	5%	10%
	Professional Service (Required for full-time only, Required: At least 15%)	15%

If a full-time faculty member receives “Approaching ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations” for Instructional Performance and “ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met” for all other criteria, the computation would be (using the suggested weighting from above for a full-time faculty member):

 

 

		Points x Weight: =	Total Points for Criterion:
Teaching and Student Learning:
Instructional Performance	Approaching ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations	3	50	150
Student Feedback and Faculty Reflection	ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met	4	25	100
Professional Responsibilities:
Administrative Performance	ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met	4	5	20
Professional Development and Growth	ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met	4	5	20
Professional Service (Required for full-time only)	ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met	4	15	60
Overall Rating:			Total Score:	350

 

Or:

(3*50) + (4*25) + (4*5) + (4*5) + (4*15) = 350 total points

This faculty member earned a total of 350 points. This is in Zone 1, so the evaluator would need to consider the specific circumstances. In this case, this was the first time this faculty member taught this course and their course materials were found to be in need of several improvements, so the evaluator might reasonably choose the higher Overall Rating of ACC Exemplary Teaching and Faculty Expectations Have Been Met.